Mohanarangam, Krishna; Nguyen, Tuan V; Stephens, Darrin W Evaluation of two equation turbulence models in a laboratory-scale thickener feedwell Conference Seventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, 2009. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Feedwell, Model, Models, SST, Turbulence @conference{mohanarangam2009evaluation,
title = {Evaluation of two equation turbulence models in a laboratory-scale thickener feedwell},
author = {Krishna Mohanarangam and Tuan V Nguyen and Darrin W Stephens},
doi = {10.13140/RG.2.1.1933.0407},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-01-01},
booktitle = {Seventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries},
journal = {Seventh International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Minerals and Process Industries},
pages = {9--11},
abstract = {Single phase modelling studies have been carried out using commercially available software ANSYS-CFX (release 11.0) on a laboratory scale thickener feedwell geometry. With the increase in complexity of feedwell and thickener geometries, meshing with a hexahedral mesh is time-consuming and sometimes impossible. The first objective of this study is to test the effectiveness of using tetrahedral/prism meshes in thickener feedwell geometries. Experimental results from a previously published lab-scale thickener feedwell geometry has been compared against the numerical predictions to verify the accuracy of these meshes towards replicating the flow structure. Mesh independency studies were also carried with these tetrahedral/prism meshes. The second objective is to test the suitability of four currently available two-equation turbulence models in our thickener feedwell geometry and their resulting flow structure. These turbulence models have been tested for open feedwell geometries with and without a shelf. NOMENCLATURE 1 a SST k-ω turbulence model constant B body forces c r1-3 curvature correction constant scale C curvature correction constant C ε1-2 k-ε turbulence model constant C μ k-ε turbulence model constant D rate of deformation 1 F First SST blending function 2 F Second SST blending function r f modified streamline curvature strength rotation f streamline curvature strength k turbulence kinetic energy k P shear production of turbulence kb P buoyancy production of turbulence p pressure p ' modified pressure * r curvature correction function r% curvature correction function S strain rate t time U velocity 3 α SST k-ω turbulence model constant β ′ SST k-ω turbulence model constant 3 β SST k-ω turbulence model constant ε turbulence dissipation rate μ dynamic viscosity eff μ effective viscosity t μ turbulent viscosity ρ density k σ k-ε turbulence model constant 3 k σ SST k-ω turbulence model constant ε σ k-ε turbulence model constant 2 ω σ SST k-ω turbulence model constant 3 ω σ SST k-ω turbulence model constant t υ kinematic turbulent viscosity Ω vorticity ω turbulence frequency Subscripts i, j, k velocity components INTRODUCTION Thickeners, as the name dictates, are used to concentrate fine particles from a slurry feed. Thickeners usually consist of a cylindrical feedwell surrounded concentrically by a large tank which forms the main body of the thickener. Slurry is fed into the feedwell along with a flocculant to induce the aggregation process under the turbulent conditions within the feedwell. Aggregates settle under gravity to produce a clear liquor collected from the outer edge of the upper surface of the thickener (overflow) and a concentrated underflow suspension of solids at the bottom of the tank. A slowly rotating rake is usually positioned at the base of the thickener to help move sediment out of the thickener for disposal or further processing. Industrial thickeners may be up to 100m in diameter, with feedwells up to 15m. The feedwell is core to the overall operational performance of a thickener. Feedwell use as a flocculation reactor is a relatively recent innovation, with the introduction of synthetic polymer flocculants in the 1960s. Feedwells also aid in dissipating the kinetic energy of the feed stream, helping to achieve uniform settling with minimum turbulence, and thereby reducing/eliminating short-circuiting in the thickener.},
keywords = {Feedwell, Model, Models, SST, Turbulence},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {conference}
}
Single phase modelling studies have been carried out using commercially available software ANSYS-CFX (release 11.0) on a laboratory scale thickener feedwell geometry. With the increase in complexity of feedwell and thickener geometries, meshing with a hexahedral mesh is time-consuming and sometimes impossible. The first objective of this study is to test the effectiveness of using tetrahedral/prism meshes in thickener feedwell geometries. Experimental results from a previously published lab-scale thickener feedwell geometry has been compared against the numerical predictions to verify the accuracy of these meshes towards replicating the flow structure. Mesh independency studies were also carried with these tetrahedral/prism meshes. The second objective is to test the suitability of four currently available two-equation turbulence models in our thickener feedwell geometry and their resulting flow structure. These turbulence models have been tested for open feedwell geometries with and without a shelf. NOMENCLATURE 1 a SST k-ω turbulence model constant B body forces c r1-3 curvature correction constant scale C curvature correction constant C ε1-2 k-ε turbulence model constant C μ k-ε turbulence model constant D rate of deformation 1 F First SST blending function 2 F Second SST blending function r f modified streamline curvature strength rotation f streamline curvature strength k turbulence kinetic energy k P shear production of turbulence kb P buoyancy production of turbulence p pressure p ' modified pressure * r curvature correction function r% curvature correction function S strain rate t time U velocity 3 α SST k-ω turbulence model constant β ′ SST k-ω turbulence model constant 3 β SST k-ω turbulence model constant ε turbulence dissipation rate μ dynamic viscosity eff μ effective viscosity t μ turbulent viscosity ρ density k σ k-ε turbulence model constant 3 k σ SST k-ω turbulence model constant ε σ k-ε turbulence model constant 2 ω σ SST k-ω turbulence model constant 3 ω σ SST k-ω turbulence model constant t υ kinematic turbulent viscosity Ω vorticity ω turbulence frequency Subscripts i, j, k velocity components INTRODUCTION Thickeners, as the name dictates, are used to concentrate fine particles from a slurry feed. Thickeners usually consist of a cylindrical feedwell surrounded concentrically by a large tank which forms the main body of the thickener. Slurry is fed into the feedwell along with a flocculant to induce the aggregation process under the turbulent conditions within the feedwell. Aggregates settle under gravity to produce a clear liquor collected from the outer edge of the upper surface of the thickener (overflow) and a concentrated underflow suspension of solids at the bottom of the tank. A slowly rotating rake is usually positioned at the base of the thickener to help move sediment out of the thickener for disposal or further processing. Industrial thickeners may be up to 100m in diameter, with feedwells up to 15m. The feedwell is core to the overall operational performance of a thickener. Feedwell use as a flocculation reactor is a relatively recent innovation, with the introduction of synthetic polymer flocculants in the 1960s. Feedwells also aid in dissipating the kinetic energy of the feed stream, helping to achieve uniform settling with minimum turbulence, and thereby reducing/eliminating short-circuiting in the thickener. |